HSKRR In The News Archives 2005:
Sep
14, 2005
Daily Journal
“Workers Sue Wal-Mart, Claim They Worked in Sweatshops”
By Draeger Martinez
A group of workers from California and five foreign countries
sued Wal-Mart on Tuesday in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging
they were forced to toil in sweatshop conditions earning wages
less than their nation’s legal minimums.
Lead plaintiffs’ lawyer Dan Stormer said the lawsuit
marks the first time in a decade that the retail giant has
to defend itself in court against sweatshop allegations. .
.
"Because of the Kathie Lee Gifford incident and other examples of using
sweatshop labor, they adopted the ‘standards for suppliers’ agreement," said
Stormer, a name partner of Hadsell & Stormer in Pasadena. "But they
clearly have not lived up to that agreement in regard to these plaintiffs."
August 3, 2005
San Jose Mercury News
“Lawsuit
claims Chevron paid for deadly raids on 2 Nigerian villages”
By Elise Ackerman
The receipt for the Jan. 4, 1999, military raid, which left
four villagers dead and nearly 70 missing and presumed dead,
came to light this summer as part of a federal lawsuit filed
on behalf of the victims in U.S. District Court in San Francisco.
. .
Barbara Enloe Hadsell, an attorney for the villagers, said
that in addition to paying the security forces, Chevron loaned
them the helicopter that was used in the attack.
She said Chevron personnel not only accompanied the soldiers
as they flew to Robin Creek but also directed the pilot to "deviate
from his course" to pursue villagers who were "getting
away."
July 24, 2005
Los Angeles Times
“Case Puts Spotlight on Office Affairs; A state
Supreme Court decision may lead employers to monitor workplace
relations”
By Molly Selvin
Until Monday, however, the state Supreme Court had yet to make
a clear statement on whether a boss who shows obvious favoritism
toward one employee creates a hostile work environment for
other employees. Lower courts in California had issued conflicting
rulings.
"That’s what this case stands for," said Pasadena lawyer Dan
Stormer, who has won several high-profile sexual harassment suits. "It
is stating the obvious – but there was no clear statement until now."
June 20, 2005
The Boston Globe
“Immigrants
cry foul over cleaning franchises”
In California, a group of immigrants and low-wage workers settled
a claim against the company in 2003. They alleged that Coverall
failed to meet any of the promises it made to them.
Virginia Keeny, a Pasadena, Calif., lawyer who represented
the plaintiffs, said some of the workers were recruited by
Coverall employees; others saw notices in local newspapers
about franchising opportunities. In every case, she said, the
workers were presented with detailed legal contracts in English
rather than in their native languages.
June 1, 2005
City News Service
“10 School Districts Sue State, Demand Standardized Testing in Spanish”
By Meredith Pierce
The Hawthorne school district and nine others filed suit today
in a bid to force the state to test 1.6 million students who
are not proficient in English in a form and language they understand.
. .
The law firms representing plaintiffs in the suit are Burke
Williams
& Sorensen in San Diego, the law offices of Marc Coleman
in Long Beach and Hadsell & Stormer Inc. in Pasadena.
Other plaintiffs are the California Association for Bilingual
Education, Californians Together, the California League of
United Latin American Citizens and several students. They
are asking the court to declare that the state has violated
NCLB and the English-language learners’
rights under the California Constitution.
April 29, 2005
Los Angeles Times
“Judge Lifts Court Control Over O.C.’s Jail System; The ruling
says state law now makes oversight largely redundant. Plaintiffs vow to appeal.”
By Jeff Gottlieb
After 27 years, the Orange County jail system no longer must
operate under court-ordered guidelines governing the treatment
of prisoners, a federal judge has ruled. . .
The decision angered attorneys for the plaintiffs, who vowed
to appeal the decision and said they would prevail. . . Attorney
Dan Stormer said he agreed that state law set standards for
jail conditions, but "that law is not being followed."
April 10, 2005
Pasadena Star-News
“Small Pasadena law firm takes on the big issues and wins”
By Sonya Geis
The small law practice has a sizable reputation as a powerful
advocate for civil rights. Its 10 lawyers have a long record
of wins in cases that pit women, minorities, prisoners and
the disabled against large institutions. Its partners regularly
appear on lists of the top trial lawyers in Southern California.
. . .
In 1996, the firm entered new territory by taking on a human-rights
lawsuit against El Segundo-based oil company Unocal. . . .
[T]he company settled the case last month. The terms of the
settlement are confidential, but industry-watchers speculate
the amount is around $55 million, said Arvind Ganeshan, director
of business and human rights programs for Human Rights Watch.
April 4, 2005
Los Angeles Times
“Obituaries; John T. McTernan, 94; Lawyer Fought to Protect Civil Rights”
By Dennis McLellan, Times Staff Writer
John T. McTernan, a highly regarded Los Angeles civil rights
lawyer who fought many landmark civil liberties and labor cases,
including seven before the U.S. Supreme Court, has died. .
.
One of McTernan's most important cases, which was decided by
the Supreme Court in 1957, established the rule that a defendant
has the right to be informed of the evidence the government
says it has gained from informers and to examine and challenge
that evidence.
"This is an extraordinarily important principle in a democracy -- that
the accused be able to confront the evidence that the government says it has
against them, so that we do not have a system of secret tribunals," Barbara
Hadsell, a Pasadena civil rights lawyer who worked with McTernan for nearly
20 years, told The Times last week. . .
Mar 22, 2005
Daily Journal
“Unocal, Burma Villagers Settle Violence Case: Suit Says Oil Giant Allowed
Soldiers to Rape, Kill, Enslave – 1980s Construction”
By Blair Clarkson
Unocal Corp. finalized a settlement Monday with Burmese villagers
over allegations the oil giant allowed Myanmar soldiers to
rape, murder and enslave villagers during construction of a
gas pipeline in the 1980s.
Though the financial terms were confidential, news sources
reported in March that Unocal had sued its insurers in Los
Angeles federal court, claiming that the companies had declined
to cover the proposed settlement and honor policies worth $55
million. . .
"We're extremely pleased with the result," said plaintiffs' attorney
Dan Stormer of Pasadena's Hadsell & Stormer. "The case has now been
concluded."
March 9, 2005
CNN
“Slavery
and Trafficking in the United States”
GUTIERREZ: A neighbor finally called the police. No criminal
charges were filed against the Jacksons, but civil rights attorney
Dan Stormer filed a civil law suit against them.
STORMER: The Jacksons have stature within the community. I
mean, this is a man who is vice president of corporate legal
affairs for Sony. The jury found under the laws of this country
that she had been held, falsely imprisoned, held as a slave,
and her rights violated.
February 2005
International Enforcement Law Reporter
“Unocal Settles Alien Tort Claims Act Suit on Myanmar”
By Bruce Zagaris
On December 13, 2004, plaintiffs and the Unocal Corporation
agreed to settle lawsuits concerning human rights violations
committed during the construction of a pipeline in Myanmar.
. .
Dan Stormer, a lawyer for the villagers, said the settlement
would be used partly to develop programs to improve living
conditions, health care and education and protect the rights
of people from the pipeline region.
|
To keep up with our firm's accomplishments and other news, follow us on our blog here.
To contact us please call our offices at (626) 585-9600 or send us an email.
Se habla español
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Copyright © 2009 Hadsell Stormer Keeny Richardson & Renick, LLP. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include the above copyright notice.
|
|